Frankenstein: A Dark, Gothic Spectacle That Finds Humanity Amid Horror

Netflix Prime Video Apple TV+ HBO Max Disney+

Frankenstein (2025)

Strengths

Striking Visuals & Atmospheric Design

Under Guillermo del Toro’s direction, Frankenstein becomes a feast for the eyes — gothic sets, moody lighting, ornate period detail, and a blend of practical and digital effects make it haunting and beautiful in equal measure.

The creature design is especially impressive: the monster feels at once grotesque and sympathetic, a visual embodiment of pain, confusion, and longing that resonates more deeply than simple horror-makeup could.

Add to that the score and sound design — they support the mood perfectly, intensifying dread, sorrow and occasional flashes of wonder in equal measure.

Powerful Lead Performances & Emotional Core

The casting delivers. Jacob Elordi, as the Creature, gives a nuanced performance — he conveys innocence and suffering with body language, fragility, rage and heartbreak. Many critics highlight this as the emotional heart of the film.

Oscar Isaac as Victor Frankenstein balances ambition, hubris and tragic obsession. While he sometimes dips into “mad scientist” territory, he remains compelling — you understand his drive even if you recoil at its consequences.

Thematic Depth — Identity, Otherness, Despair, Redemption

The film stays true to the core moral and existential themes of the original novel: what it means to be human; who claims the right to play God; what happens when society rejects those who are different. Del Toro doesn’t shy away from these heavy questions.

The story becomes as much about the creature’s longing for belonging and acceptance as about Victor’s destructive ambition — making it less a monster horror flick, more a tragic human drama.

Ambitious, Serious Reimagining of a Classic

Rather than a cheap horror rewrite, this is a lavish, intense, heartfelt re-examination of the classic. It embraces shame, grief, existential despair, compassion, and the horror of violence — with patience and gravity.

Criticisms & Limitations

Inconsistent Tone & Pacing, Especially Early On

At over two and a half hours, the film sometimes feels overstuffed. Some sequences — particularly exposition, character setup, and early world-building — drag the momentum.

A few critics argue that the film veers between horror-gothic grandeur and melodramatic romance or pulp-gothic excess, making the tone uneven in spots.

Deviations from the Novel — Simplified Relationships & Moral Complexity

To suit his vision, Del Toro alters aspects of character motivations and dynamics. Some viewers appreciate the reinterpretation, but fans of the original novel or earlier, more ambiguous adaptations may find these changes reductive — particularly around the Creature’s moral journey and Victor’s villainy.

The relationship between creator and creation becomes more black-and-white than the layered moral ambiguity present in the book.

Emotional Highs Sometimes Undercut by Spectacle

Although many moments of horror and despair hit hard, there are times when visual showmanship overshadows emotional subtlety — the film risks feeling more like a gothic spectacle than a human tragedy.

Verdict — Who It’s For, What It Leaves Behind

Frankenstein (2025) stands as one of this year’s boldest literary adaptations: visually grand, emotionally raw, morally provocative. It works best when you watch it as a tragic, gothic meditation on creation, identity, suffering, and what it means to be human.

If you appreciate films that ask difficult questions rather than offer neat answers — if you can stomach horror, sorrow, and the vivid portrayal of human cruelty and empathy — this version of Frankenstein delivers something rare: a monster movie with a soul.

On the flip side, if you prefer tight pacing, straightforward storytelling, or faithful adaptation of the source material, you might find some parts dragging or overly stylized.

Bottom line: It’s not flawless — but it is important, powerful, and in many ways unforgettable.