Most visited Last 7 days
Thunderbolts* (2025)
Thunderbolts * (2025), directed by Jake Schreier, takes a fresh, emotionally grounded turn within the Marvel Cinematic Universe by uniting a ragtag crew of disillusioned antiheroes in a character‑driven spy thriller. With a cast led by Florence Pugh, David Harbour, Sebastian Stan, Lewis Pullman, and Julia Louis‑Dreyfus, the film foregrounds themes of trauma, identity, and fractured loyalties.
What Works
Emotional Depth & Real Stakes
The film breaks from MCU convention by exploring psychological wounds—trauma, depression, guilt—particularly through Lewis Pullman's Bob/Sentry. His struggle merges existential weight with blockbuster spectacle.
Florence Pugh delivers a standout portrayal of Yelena Belova: conflicted, fierce, and emotionally resonant.
Grounded Action & Team Dynamism
The film leans into practical stunt work and a darker, more grounded aesthetic, giving it a grittier feel than recent exuberant MCU installments. Panoramic combat and character‑based action work well.
The ensemble cast—Yelena, Red Guardian, Ghost, John Walker—gets memorable chemistry, witty banter, and purposeful arcs.
Focused Storytelling with Meaning
The film avoids cosmic clutter or multiverse detours. Instead, it builds a tight mission-driven thriller with a cohesive emotional throughline.
What Falls Short
Third-Act Rush & Climax Issues
Critics note that the final confrontation with Sentry/Void feels rushed and undercooked, undermining what could have been a compelling conflict.
Visual Palette & Underwritten Characters
Some argue the film’s visuals feel muted and less vibrant than typical MCU entries.
Characters like Taskmaster and Ghost, while interesting additions, don’t receive enough development relative to Yelena and Bob.
User & Critic Voices
On IMDb, responses diverge:
“Strong first half … but then it all takes a strange turn … the stakes vanish” — reflects viewer frustration with pacing.
“They portrayed ‘depression and human darkness’ beautifully … cast syncs together beautifully” — underscores emotional wins and team chemistry.
Reddit users, meanwhile, embraced the concept:
“Thunderbolts feels like a redemption arc for so many underused characters like Red Guardian… Ghost… I’m genuinely excited.”
Verdict
Thunderbolts * marks a notable shift for Marvel—a superhero blockbuster that dares to dwell on emotional trauma and character fragility. Anchored by strong performances (especially Pugh and Pullman), grounded action, and thematic purpose, it stands out as one of the most mature and introspective entries of Phase 5. It’s not without flaws—especially in pacing and climactic payoff—but its heart makes it one of the most refreshing MCU films in years.
Fans of antihero dynamics, psychological nuance, or grounded action will find plenty to appreciate. Viewers seeking cosmic scope or emotional payoff in dialogue-heavy finales might feel underserved.
Bad Education (2019)
Bad Education, a film based on the true story of the biggest theft of an American school,it's about the $11 million scandal at the Roslyn School District. The prime suspects are Frank Tassone (Hugh Jackman) and Pam Glockin (Alison Janney). Frank Tassone, a superintendent of Roslyn district schools who genuinely cares about the condition of students and does what is best for them, remembers everyone's names, and cares excessively about his physical appearance. Pam Glockin is a hardworking and reliable woman at work. So far, everything is going smoothly until a student start writing a newspaper article on the financial side of the school.
Bad Education is very captivating, for some the first 30 minutes of it may seem a little boring, in fact, nothing happens, we don't know what's going on, but it is building the characters and lays the foundation stone, after that the film jumps and changes its tone, then it makes you immediately hang to the end, where it shows you another side of the characters, and reveals the story to you through a school student. After finishing watching I was surprised to know that this is the second film directed by Cory Finley, he did a very good job.
Hugh Jackman is simply the favorite part of the film, because of his deep acting and facial expressions, we see as the film progresses, how the shadows of his character change clearly and appropriately to complete the course of his story part with excellence, for me, this is the best act of Hugh after Les Misérables (2012), Prisoners (2013). And let us not forget about Alison Janney she always delivers good performance.
Bad Education is very captivating, for some the first 30 minutes of it may seem a little boring, in fact, nothing happens, we don't know what's going on, but it is building the characters and lays the foundation stone, after that the film jumps and changes its tone, then it makes you immediately hang to the end, where it shows you another side of the characters, and reveals the story to you through a school student. After finishing watching I was surprised to know that this is the second film directed by Cory Finley, he did a very good job.
Hugh Jackman is simply the favorite part of the film, because of his deep acting and facial expressions, we see as the film progresses, how the shadows of his character change clearly and appropriately to complete the course of his story part with excellence, for me, this is the best act of Hugh after Les Misérables (2012), Prisoners (2013). And let us not forget about Alison Janney she always delivers good performance.
Conclusion
An almost perfect character study by Hugh Jackman, how he conveyed to us the experience of a person, that look good and lovable but does something bad to shock everyone by it and break people's trust. In short, the beauty of this film lies in the wonderful performance of actors like Hugh Jackman and OfCourse in the script by writers Mike Makowsky and Robert Kolker, which makes you feel for a moment that the film is a figment of imagination and not a real story. I really appreciate this work.
Score: 7/10
Footnotes:
The original school where the incident occurred refused to shoot the film.
The writer confirmed that he had many experiences that were embodied in the work during high school.
The original school where the incident occurred refused to shoot the film.
The writer confirmed that he had many experiences that were embodied in the work during high school.
Sorry, Baby (2025)
What Works
Compassionate and Authentic Portrayal of Trauma
In her feature debut, Eva Victor takes on the role of Agnes—a woman grappling with the lingering effects of sexual assault—with exceptional sensitivity and emotional precision. The film delves into the reverberations of trauma rather than the event itself, portraying Agnes’s daily reality with quiet power.
Nuanced Balance of Tone
The film impressively balances emotional honesty with unexpected humor. Agnes’s friendship with Lydie (Naomi Ackie) provides moments of warmth and genuine laughter, anchoring the narrative in resilient humanity.
Visually Poetic, Intimate Direction
Stylistic storytelling, including evocative shots like Agnes entering a house with the camera lingering outside as night falls, underscores trauma with minimalism and emotional weight. The grounded cinematography beautifully reflects New England's melancholic stillness.
Structural Clarity and Emotional Evolution
Divided into five non-linear chapters spanning years, the film reveals how healing isn’t linear. This structure mirrors memory and recovery, illustrating Agnes’s transformation in an honest and relatable way.
Where It Stumbles
Occasional Tonal Jaggedness
Some viewers felt the humor sometimes undercuts the emotional gravity of the story, making tone balance difficult in parts.
Minor Narrative Distractions
Certain subplots and secondary characters—like a subplot involving Lucas Hedges’s neighbor—felt underdeveloped, standing out in contrast to the film’s otherwise cohesive emotional drive.
Structural Shifts Can Disrupt Flow
While the chapter-based format is effective, it occasionally disrupts emotional momentum and connection, creating small jolts in narrative immersion.
Final Verdict
Sorry, Baby is a remarkable and deeply human cinematic debut. Through its sharp humor, visual restraint, and powerful performances—especially from Eva Victor and Naomi Ackie—it breathes life into a story about trauma, friendship, and resilience. While imperfect in tone and structure, its compassion and quiet wit make it a standout of 2025.
Recommended for: viewers seeking emotionally intelligent, intimate storytelling that honors strength in vulnerability.
Action, Drama, Thriller
Synopsis
A broker who arranges lucrative deals between corrupt corporations and their threats breaks his own rules when a desperate new client turns to him for protection to survive.
Rating: R 
Directed by: David Mackenzie
Written by: Justin Piasecki
Trailer
Action, Adventure, Sci-Fi
Synopsis
Superman struggles to balance his alien Kryptonian origins with his human upbringing as Clark Kent, a reporter. As a symbol of truth, justice, and the human way, he faces a world that increasingly sees these ideals as outdated.
Rating: PG-13
Directed by: James Gunn
Written by: James Gunn, Jerry Siegel, Joe Shuster
Trailer
Action, Adventure, Sci-Fi
Synopsis
Three of the fiercest warriors in human history become prey to the ultimate killer of killers.
Rating: R
Directed by: Dan Trachtenberg, Joshua Wassung
Written by: Micho Robert Rutare, Dan Trachtenberg, Jim Thomas
Trailer
Horror, Sci-Fi, Thriller
Synopsis
While scavenging the deep ends of a derelict space station, a group of young space colonists come face to face with the most terrifying life form in the universe.
Rating: R
Directed by: Fede Alvarez
Written by: Dan O'Bannon, Ronald Shusett, Fede Alvarez
Trailer
The Life of Chuck (2024)
The Life of Chuck (2025), directed by Mike Flanagan and based on Stephen King’s novella, trades conventional horror for heartfelt reflection. Divided into three reverse-chronological movements—Thanks, Chuck; Buskers Forever; and I Contain Multitudes—the film navigates mortality, joy, and memory. It’s a tonal tapestry that asks viewers to embrace life’s fleeting moments, though not without moments of dissonance.
What Resonates
A Poignant Opening Act
The first chapter offers a serene yet unsettling apocalypse—sunlit streets amid societal collapse, punctuated by strange billboards celebrating Chuck’s life. It captures existential dread in a quietly affecting way, illustrating how life’s end can evoke strange connections across the world.
A Joyous Dance of Humanity
At the film’s heart is a spontaneous dance where Chuck (Tom Hiddleston) ignites a moment of pure, shared joy with a busker and a stranger. It’s a cinematic high note: kinetic, tender, and unforgettable—an assertion that even one fleeting moment can define a life.
Emotional and Thematic Layers
Through subtle revelations about family, grief, and regret—especially in Chuck’s childhood with his grandparents (Mark Hamill and Mia Sara)—Flanagan gives viewers space to meditate on the small moments that shape our lives. The film resists overt explanations, inviting emotional participation rather than prescribing it.
Visually and Structurally Unique
With its three-part structure and shifting casts, the film plays like a symphonic movement rather than a narrative, weaving memory and identity across time. Critics from RogerEbert.com and others have praised its unhurried ambition and willingness to leave room for interpretation.
What May Undermine Its Impact
Narrative Disconnection & Sentimentality
Several critics—The Guardian chief among them—found the screenplay’s earnestness overly saccharine. Flanagan's reliance on voice-over narration sometimes undercuts emotional depth, reminding viewers of what they just saw rather than letting feelings emerge organically.
Emotional Distance from the Protagonist
Although the film centers on Chuck, we seldom get to know him fully. Critics like those at The Guardian and The Times felt his character remains elusive, framed more as an idea than a person—making it harder to feel truly connected.
Inconsistent Tone and Pacing
The film shifts from reflective apocalypse to stylized musical interlude to coming-of-age drama. While ambitious, some find the tonal transitions jarring, particularly the second act's upbeat dance interrupting the somber mood established at the start.
Final Thoughts
The Life of Chuck is a tender, contemplative film that speaks softly but lingers long after the credits roll. It may feel too gentle or emotionally coagulated for some—but for those open to its mood and pace, it's a deeply human meditation on the fleeting beauty of everyday life, elevated by strong performances, especially from Hiddleston and supporting cast.
Followers
Year
Genre
ContactForm1
Smart Search
Featured Posts
Drama, Fantasy, Horror
Synopsis
Through a failed medical experiment, the priest becomes apathetic and is forced to abandon by asceticism.
Rating: R
Directed by: Chan-wook Park
Written by: Émile Zola, Chan-wook Park
Trailer
Most visited Last 30 days
Mystery, Sci-Fi, Thriller
Synopsis
A team of special agents uncovers a groundbreaking computer program designed to lure and capture online predators. Partnering with the program's troubled creator, they quickly realize the AI is evolving far beyond its intended purpose.
Rating: NR
Directed by: Franklin Ritch
Written by: Franklin Ritch
Trailer
Drama
Synopsis
Something bad happened to Agnes, but life moves forward—at least for everyone around her.
Rating: R
Directed by: Eva Victor
Written by: Eva Victor
Trailer
Mickey 17 (2025)
In Mickey 17, director Bong Joon-ho ventures into the realm of science fiction, crafting a narrative that intertwines dark comedy with existential musings. The film follows Mickey Barnes, portrayed by Robert Pattinson, an "Expendable" human clone assigned perilous tasks on the icy planet Niflheim. Each time Mickey perishes, a new iteration is printed, retaining most of his memories but grappling with the existential weight of his disposability.
Bong's storytelling delves into themes of identity, mortality, and societal hierarchy. The narrative becomes particularly compelling when two versions of Mickey coexist, prompting reflections on self-worth and individuality. Pattinson's dual performance captures the nuances of a character caught between duty and self-preservation.
Critically, Mickey 17 has garnered a 77% rating on Rotten Tomatoes, with audiences giving it a 73% score. While some praise its inventive approach and satirical edge, others find the plot convoluted and the pacing uneven. The film's ambitious narrative structure and thematic depth have sparked discussions about its place within Bong's oeuvre.
In summary, Mickey 17 offers a thought-provoking exploration of humanity through the lens of science fiction. While it may not resonate with all viewers, its blend of satire and speculative storytelling provides a unique cinematic experience.
Sorry, Baby (2025)
What Works
Compassionate and Authentic Portrayal of Trauma
In her feature debut, Eva Victor takes on the role of Agnes—a woman grappling with the lingering effects of sexual assault—with exceptional sensitivity and emotional precision. The film delves into the reverberations of trauma rather than the event itself, portraying Agnes’s daily reality with quiet power.
Nuanced Balance of Tone
The film impressively balances emotional honesty with unexpected humor. Agnes’s friendship with Lydie (Naomi Ackie) provides moments of warmth and genuine laughter, anchoring the narrative in resilient humanity.
Visually Poetic, Intimate Direction
Stylistic storytelling, including evocative shots like Agnes entering a house with the camera lingering outside as night falls, underscores trauma with minimalism and emotional weight. The grounded cinematography beautifully reflects New England's melancholic stillness.
Structural Clarity and Emotional Evolution
Divided into five non-linear chapters spanning years, the film reveals how healing isn’t linear. This structure mirrors memory and recovery, illustrating Agnes’s transformation in an honest and relatable way.
Where It Stumbles
Occasional Tonal Jaggedness
Some viewers felt the humor sometimes undercuts the emotional gravity of the story, making tone balance difficult in parts.
Minor Narrative Distractions
Certain subplots and secondary characters—like a subplot involving Lucas Hedges’s neighbor—felt underdeveloped, standing out in contrast to the film’s otherwise cohesive emotional drive.
Structural Shifts Can Disrupt Flow
While the chapter-based format is effective, it occasionally disrupts emotional momentum and connection, creating small jolts in narrative immersion.
Final Verdict
Sorry, Baby is a remarkable and deeply human cinematic debut. Through its sharp humor, visual restraint, and powerful performances—especially from Eva Victor and Naomi Ackie—it breathes life into a story about trauma, friendship, and resilience. While imperfect in tone and structure, its compassion and quiet wit make it a standout of 2025.
Recommended for: viewers seeking emotionally intelligent, intimate storytelling that honors strength in vulnerability.
Horror, Sci-Fi, Thriller
Synopsis
While scavenging the deep ends of a derelict space station, a group of young space colonists come face to face with the most terrifying life form in the universe.
Rating: R
Directed by: Fede Alvarez
Written by: Dan O'Bannon, Ronald Shusett, Fede Alvarez
Trailer
The Life of Chuck (2024)
The Life of Chuck (2025), directed by Mike Flanagan and based on Stephen King’s novella, trades conventional horror for heartfelt reflection. Divided into three reverse-chronological movements—Thanks, Chuck; Buskers Forever; and I Contain Multitudes—the film navigates mortality, joy, and memory. It’s a tonal tapestry that asks viewers to embrace life’s fleeting moments, though not without moments of dissonance.
What Resonates
A Poignant Opening Act
The first chapter offers a serene yet unsettling apocalypse—sunlit streets amid societal collapse, punctuated by strange billboards celebrating Chuck’s life. It captures existential dread in a quietly affecting way, illustrating how life’s end can evoke strange connections across the world.
A Joyous Dance of Humanity
At the film’s heart is a spontaneous dance where Chuck (Tom Hiddleston) ignites a moment of pure, shared joy with a busker and a stranger. It’s a cinematic high note: kinetic, tender, and unforgettable—an assertion that even one fleeting moment can define a life.
Emotional and Thematic Layers
Through subtle revelations about family, grief, and regret—especially in Chuck’s childhood with his grandparents (Mark Hamill and Mia Sara)—Flanagan gives viewers space to meditate on the small moments that shape our lives. The film resists overt explanations, inviting emotional participation rather than prescribing it.
Visually and Structurally Unique
With its three-part structure and shifting casts, the film plays like a symphonic movement rather than a narrative, weaving memory and identity across time. Critics from RogerEbert.com and others have praised its unhurried ambition and willingness to leave room for interpretation.
What May Undermine Its Impact
Narrative Disconnection & Sentimentality
Several critics—The Guardian chief among them—found the screenplay’s earnestness overly saccharine. Flanagan's reliance on voice-over narration sometimes undercuts emotional depth, reminding viewers of what they just saw rather than letting feelings emerge organically.
Emotional Distance from the Protagonist
Although the film centers on Chuck, we seldom get to know him fully. Critics like those at The Guardian and The Times felt his character remains elusive, framed more as an idea than a person—making it harder to feel truly connected.
Inconsistent Tone and Pacing
The film shifts from reflective apocalypse to stylized musical interlude to coming-of-age drama. While ambitious, some find the tonal transitions jarring, particularly the second act's upbeat dance interrupting the somber mood established at the start.
Final Thoughts
The Life of Chuck is a tender, contemplative film that speaks softly but lingers long after the credits roll. It may feel too gentle or emotionally coagulated for some—but for those open to its mood and pace, it's a deeply human meditation on the fleeting beauty of everyday life, elevated by strong performances, especially from Hiddleston and supporting cast.
Horror, Romance
Synopsis
Years into their relationship, Tim and Millie face a turning point as they relocate to the countryside. With tensions already high, a confrontation with an unnatural force threatens to unravel their lives, their love, and even their very beings.
Rating: R
Directed by: Michael Shanks
Written by: Michael Shanks
Trailer
Emilie Blichfeldt's The Ugly Stepsister (2025) is a daring reimagining of the classic Cinderella tale, transformed into a visceral body horror narrative that delves deep into the extremes of societal beauty standards. Set in 18th-century Europe, the film follows Elvira (Lea Myren), a young woman overshadowed by her conventionally attractive stepsister, Agnes (Thea Sofie Loch Næss). Driven by a desperate desire to gain the attention of Prince Julian (Isac Calmroth) and escape her impoverished circumstances, Elvira undergoes a series of harrowing cosmetic procedures orchestrated by her ambitious mother, Rebekka (Ane Dahl Torp).
Blichfeldt's direction is unflinching, presenting scenes that are both grotesque and poignant. From the sewing of eyelashes into eyelids to the ingestion of a tapeworm for weight loss, the film doesn't shy away from the macabre, using these elements to underscore the damaging lengths individuals might go to conform to societal ideals of beauty. The cinematography by Marcel Zyskind captures the bleakness of Elvira's world, while the haunting score by Kaada and Vilde Tuv amplifies the film's unsettling atmosphere.
Critics have noted the film's effective subversion of traditional fairy tale roles, with Agnes portrayed not as the innocent victim but as an enforcer of oppressive beauty norms . This role reversal challenges viewers to reconsider preconceived notions about characters often taken at face value in classic narratives. The film's commitment to its thematic exploration has garnered it a 96% approval rating on Rotten Tomatoes, reflecting its impact and resonance with audiences.
In conclusion, The Ugly Stepsister is a bold and unsettling film that uses the framework of a familiar story to confront uncomfortable truths about beauty, identity, and societal expectations. It's a cinematic experience that is as thought-provoking as it is disturbing, leaving a lasting impression on those who dare to watch.
